Florence Kelley Rhetorical Analysis free essay sample

In the times of the Progressive Era (1875-1910), all people – children, women, and men – worked to get more income for their families. Hence the name â€Å"progressive,† all people were engaging in business and needed more education for recently developed ideas. Florence Kelly, who was engaged though the hardships of child labor, presented an assertive and powerful speech to the National American Woman Suffrage Association to preach her own thought and knowledge and to convey her message to â€Å"free the children from toil! † Her striking, informational, infuriating rhetorical strategies make the convention of women to ignore. Sorrowful and pitiful were words to describe how Florence Kelly felt towards the act of Child Labor in America. Children would be up during the hours of darkness – kitting stockings, stamping buckles, and weaving cotton – â€Å"earning their bread† for their families’ income, and Kelly was tired of it. Florence Kelley uses an asyndeton to exemplify the ongoing list of gender and age groups that all of their wages were the same except that the girls’ wage increased more. We will write a custom essay sample on Florence Kelley Rhetorical Analysis or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page She says that men, women, youth, and boys â€Å"increase† in the race of â€Å"breadwinners. † To follow, she adds on another never-ending, interrupted asyndeton saying that girls are in â€Å"commerce,† in â€Å"offices,† and in â€Å"manufacturing. † In the subsequent paragraph, she uses pathos and glum diction to make the convention of women feel sympathy for the little girls working in factories. According to Kelly, â€Å"while they sleep,† several thousand girls work â€Å"all the night through† in the â€Å"deafening† noise of the spindles for goods to sell to the people. Florence Kelley wants the women in the NAWSA convention to be compassionate toward these young, suffering girls. She appeals to these women because moms don’t like to see their children suffer. After all, how would working in a factory all night sound? In her body paragraphs, she invokes informational and logical facts by all of the factual evidence she proposes from different young girls working in distinct parts of the county. With that, she starts attacking government laws. Florence Kelley expressed the opinion that Georgia had no â€Å"restrictions,† New Jersey permits labor â€Å"all night long,† and North and South Carolina and Georgia place no restrictions upon the â€Å"work at night. † By this, Kelley feels disgusted. Since there is no restrictions for work, children have are stuck spinning and weaving cotton all night. Most of the southern states care about getting the work done, so they can care less who works and since children are easier to control, they use them. At this point, Kelley has had enough. She ends it with a minor use of pathos by starting the concluding paragraph with â€Å"for the sake of the children†¦Ã¢â‚¬  She additionally settles it with a compelling call to action to persuade the NAWSA to â€Å"free the children from toil! † This is what causes the convention of women to all stand in solicitude for these children. While this occurs between paragraphs, she shifts in her tone. Kelley goes from a very passionate and sentimental tone to a very influential and potent tone. After she explains how some states use child labor, she gets to a powerful setting by asking rhetorical questions – hoping that they would come to their senses. Florence Kelley makes an effort on being a voice for child labor. She elucidates her emotional and heartfelt feelings towards the women in the convention to try to get them to ruminate on it. By using an asyndeton, pathos, glum diction, informational and logical facts, and a very passionate and sentimental, to a captivating potent tone, she conveys her audience to follow her and halt child labor.